Tools for the next generation of Web Applications: Introduction
I do not know how the web will evolve in the future, I don’t think that anybody knows how the web of 2020 will look like, or what applications will be popular then.
But regardless of the direction the web evolves, we will undoubtedly see more and more complex client-side applications being developed. And a lot of the applications that were traditionally native applications will probably migrate to the browser within this time frame.
The migrating applications might include everything from games to large simulations to image and video editing, and everything inbetween. Your imagination is hopefully the only limit to what you will be able to achieve.
Because betting on the web is one of the safest bets to take, it is simply the platform that is most accessible to people today, and the platform people care about the most.
The goal of this series of articles is to give you some insight into some techniques, frameworks and tools that might be useful to build this new generation of applications, or to allow you to improve your current applications.
The tools that I am most interested in are tools that enable a new class of applications that we earlier could not build in the browser without plugins, and we’ll primarily focus on the set of these are almost purely performance increasing.
- Typed Arrays
- SIMD Intrinsics
- River Trail
- WebGL (for computing, not graphics)
But to understand these new tools of the web, we need to understand the native libraries and features that power them.
River Trail and WebCL utilizes OpenCL to allow a piece of code to run on multiple processor cores, and in the case of WebCL, allow your code to run on graphics cards and even specialist OpenCL accelerators right from your browser.
If you haven’t heard of OpenCL, it is a framework for heterogenous computing designed by Khronos (who are also maintaining the OpenGL standard), and allows you to execute kernels written in a high-performance variant of C on just about any processor around. OpenCL supports everything from large clusters down to small embedded systems.
For example, Mozilla is currently working on Ionmonkey. Ionmonkey is a new whole-method JIT for Spidermonkey that hopefully brings some significant speedup for many types of code (and especially the type of code that we are interested in). It isn’t ready yet, but we can already see some benchmarks here and follow how it develops.
Internet Explorer 9 introduced the new Chakra engine, which has some interesting features that will probably migrate to other engines. For example, it compiles code on a separate thread, allowing it to load code faster and start executing it quicker. And I am convinced that Internet Explorer 10 will introduce features that will allow Internet Explorer to defend its position as the most widely used browser.
The two other browser vendors, Webkit (Apple and friends) and Opera recently shipped new browser engines, and support all the engine-level features that we currently expect, and are very likely to stay competitive in the future.
But there are a lot of other features that are in the planning stage. A pet feature of mine, for example, are SIMD intrinsics. SIMD (Single-Instruction Multiple-Data) is a method for improving computational throughput in modern processors by performing the same operation in parallel on multiple pieces of data.
This leads us to more complex parallelization features that introduce more than one thread of execution.
But make sure that you do not forget about them, because they are a good fallback and can be a force multiplier when combined with more advanced features.
The most compelling feature of River Trail is that it is tightly integrated with the browser, and therefore allows for a lot more optimization than WebCL (or OpenCL) allows. Don’t be surprised if a future River Trail implementation outpaces WebCL significantly on short kernels where OpenCL imposes a too high communication overhead.
WebCL is essentially the big brother of River Trail, exposing the full OpenCL API to the web programmer, and allows you to use unmodified OpenCL kernels in your application. It is essentially the more flexible version of River Trail, and is designed to allow you to use any OpenCL accelerator in the system, including graphics processors and so on.
WebCL is also the API that we will be using the most throughout this series, mainly since the compilers are mature, and it is also the language and framework that I am most familiar with.
But River Trail has some interesting opportunities that we won’t see in WebCL since could be tighter integrated into the browser at a future point. For example could an implementation of River Trail significantly reduce the communication overhead required to run kernels on the CPU, which is currently quite significant in OpenCL.
WebGL on the other hand has the advantage that it is reasonably mature, and allows execution on just about every graphics card available.
But I generally wouldn’t recommend using it for computation though unless you have very specific requirements, since even the simplest tasks can easily turn extremely complex unless you’re very good at GLSL and WebGL. It is simply not designed for computation, only graphics.
There are many tools and frameworks already available in a pre-release form for us to play with, and the best way to get used to them is to actually use them. Just be be aware of the changing and non-final nature and use this time to your advantage, most developers won’t start using these tools until they are almost ready, and by then it is to late to influence their growth.
In addition to tools that ‘merely’ grant us faster performance, we have a lot of tools that simply allow us to do a lot of things that we could not do before, but those are interesting enough to get their own introductions when we meet them later in the series.
The next episode will be a shorter one, and contain instructions on how to set up our development environment on Windows or Linux. For example, installing different OpenCL drivers, WebCL plugins and River Trail.
There are currently at least three different implementations of WebCL,